Gretchen Weirob represents the atheistic position, and Sam Miller the theistic position, while the neutral Dave Cohen simply helps the discussion along whenever the main discussants get stuck. The three talk about basic issues related to the logical problem of evil, such as whether any theodicy renders it possible although not necessarily plausible that God and evil coexist, whether divine omniscience and human freedom are compatible, and how atheists can make sense of good and evil.
She wants Miller to proof there is possibility of his beliefs. She thinks if God really exists in this world, then God is a monster evil because God lets her suffered.
It seems that he is so helpful in this debate. The dialogue is lively and entertaining. Perry has succeeded in providing a clear and engaging introductory-level discussion of the logical problem of evil, which will appeal to both new philosophy students and the average Joe or Mary on the street who has only a few hours per year to read philosophy.
She only believe evil exist without God.
She does not believe God exist. This allows us to examine our understanding of the good, evil and the existence of God. Such digressions serve not only add a familiar feel to the discussions, but to point out certain pitfalls that should be avoided in such debates.
Therefore, he has to convince Weirob to believe there is possibility that God and evil are both exist in order to win the debate and also pray for her.
Weirob is a philosopher who is not a Christian. On occasion, Weirob and Miller each also gets emotional or goes off on a tangent, but each is quickly pulled back into the give-and-take of rational argument. Miller is a Christian who believes in God.
References  John Perry. Perry shows a clear position of Weirob, Miller, and Cohen. He thinks evil and God can both exist in this world.
In fact, she believes there maybe no God exists. A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality. Inphilosopher John Perry published a well-received little book in which three fictional friends engaged in a series of stimulating but easy-to-understand discussions about personal identity and immortality.
Weirob does not believe in God, so she does not admit Miller to pray for her.
However, it is difficult to fault an introductory-level book for not doing something it feels would take it too far afield -- it is sufficient that Perry acknowledges that those questions are in fact legitimate ones although he has Weirob realize too late that she should not have taken them for granted.
He is the judge.
Cohen is a neutral one between them. Dialogue on Good, Evil, and theExistence of God. He helps Weirob and Miller to figure out what is their own point of view all the times and also he raises some useful ideas to solve their arguments.Mar 02, · John Perry’s Dialogue on Good, Evil, and the Existence of God is a relatively short dialogue (70 pages) that features three friends arguing about issues at the heart of Christianity.
Christian minister Sam Miller is challenged by his atheist philosopher friend Gretchen Weirob to prove that belief in an omnipotent, omniscient, and.
John Perry Dialogue on Good, Evil and the Existence of God Part III The Second Morning 1. SM shows up the second morning and he looks glum. The reason is that he is worried that perhaps God is responsible for the evil we commit. Dialogue on Good, Evil, and theExistence of God.
Indianapolis: Hackett. ix+71 pp. Inphilosopher John Perry published a well-received little book in which three fictional friends engaged in a series of stimulating but easy-to-understand discussions about personal identity and immortality. . god wiki, dialogue on good evil and the existence of god john perry, dialogue on good evil and the existence of god ebook, dialogue on good evil and the existence of god the first morning Title.
View Test Prep - John Perry Dialouge on Good, Evil, and the Existence of God Notes from PHIL at Northwestern University. JOHN PERRY: DIALOGUE ON GOOD, EVIL, AND %(1).
In John Perry’s book Dialogue on Good, Evil and the Existence of God, he used three characters in the dialogue in order to clarify the positions of the three characters (Weirob, Miller, and Cohen), the arguments they provide in support their positions and the “end state” of their discussion.Download