Writing a cochrane systematic reviews

Often, the title contains the target population or condition, the interventions that are compared and the outcome of interest.

Take into account that the review team writing a cochrane systematic reviews to have expertise in the area of review, but also access to methodological expertise, including statistical expertise. Each step in the process of Cochrane reviews must be performed by at least 2 people independently, to prevent errors as much as possible.

This takes some time, but will pay off later in the review process. Editorial bases, editors and review authors are expected to ensure these standards are met in Cochrane Reviews of interventions. First-time review authors are encouraged to work with others who are experienced in the process of systematic reviews and to attend training events organized by Cochrane.

Upon selecting a topic to write a Cochrane review about, it is a good idea to check the Cochrane Library to see if no one else is already working on this topic. Where possible, review authors are encouraged to seek and incorporate the views of users, including consumers, clinicians and those from varying regions and settings in the development of protocols and reviews.

The protocol needs to be followed meticulously during the review process and any deviation to the protocol has to be documented appropriately. A number of factors may motivate authors to undertake a systematic review. There may be some discussion with the editors to clarify or change the scope of the proposed review before the title can be registered.

Cochrane is a nonprofit organization that provides guidance and support to researchers and healthcare professionals who want to write high-quality systematic reviews. A systematic review is a literature overview that attempts to answer a well-defined question in a rigorous way.

Writing a review Writing a review On publication of the protocol review authors will be sent their search results. From the outset, review authors should be aware of their responsibility to update and maintain their reviews after publication.

A typology of reviews: If this is not the case, you can go on and register your title. The overall aim of a systematic review is providing reliable evidence to anyone involved in healthcare decision-making; healthcare professionals, caretakers, patients, policy makers, making sure they are able to make informed decisions, resulting in better health outcomes.

Review proposals are accepted at the discretion of the CRG. Due to the rigorous methodological requirements, Cochrane reviews are considered the gold standard in systematic reviews, and Cochrane evidence is easily picked up by popular media, policy makers and healthcare practitioners. Cochrane Belgium is there to provide support if you encounter problems during one of the review steps.

The timeline for writing and maintaining a review is flexible, but authors should be aware that Cochrane reviews take time, skills and resources beyond those generally required to complete other scholarly manuscripts. First-time review authors are encouraged to access Cochrane Training workshops and resources.

Title registration is done in consultation with the relevant review group.

Writing a Cochrane Review

We suggest to contact Cochrane Belgium already in this stage of the review process, as we can provide guidance early on and get you in contact with the appropriate review group.

J Clin Epidemiol ; Publication of a protocol does not guarantee authorship or publication of the subsequent review; and publication of a Cochrane Review does not guarantee authorship or publication of an updated version.

Often a review group also requires involvement of an author with previous experience in writing a Cochrane review. This title needs to clearly describe the research question at study.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (official guide to producing Cochrane systematic reviews) Cochrane systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies Cochrane Style Resource (designed to help you use a consistent style when writing your Cochrane review).

Cochrane Wounds editorial process flowchart for Reviews Guidance for writing the Search Methods section Plain language summary (PLS) aims to summarise the review in a style that can be understood by consumers of health care.

A young researcher's guide to a systematic review

All Cochrane systematic reviews are first registered as titles with a Cochrane Review Group. Registering your title is important to prevent duplication of effort with other authors, and to make sure your topic is appropriate for a Cochrane review.

Writing a protocol for a Cochrane Systematic Review: Athens, Greece

Writing a protocol for a Cochrane Systematic Review: Athens, Greece This is the 5th workshop organized in Athens, Greece by members (authors and editors) of the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group, and the Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology.

Writing a Systematic Literature Review: Resources for Students and Trainees This resource provides basic guidance and links to resources that will help when planning a systematic The Cochrane Collaboration website also provides a link to the Cochrane Register of Reviews which can.

The most valuable resource for conducting and writing systematic reviews is the free, online Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane also provides resources on reviews of diagnostic studies. A Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Studies is being created.

Writing a cochrane systematic reviews
Rated 4/5 based on 89 review